What could potentially complicate a case involving Intoxilyzer results?

Discrepancies between test results and field sobriety tests can significantly complicate a case involving Intoxilyzer results. The Intoxilyzer measures blood alcohol concentration (BAC) through breath samples, while field sobriety tests assess a person’s physical and mental ability to perform tasks that may indicate impairment. When the results from these two methods are not in alignment, it raises questions about the reliability of the intoxication evidence presented in court.

For example, if an officer detects signs of impairment through field sobriety tests but the Intoxilyzer indicates a BAC below the legal limit, it can create confusion and conflicts in the evidence presented. Such inconsistencies might lead to questions about the accuracy of the Intoxilyzer, the testing procedures followed, or even the potential impact of other factors influencing the results, such as medical conditions or environmental factors.

In contrast, consistent user behavior, a clear understanding of BAC limits, and proper documentation of all procedures generally support the validity and clarity of the case rather than complicate it. These factors help establish a clear framework for understanding the defendant's level of impairment according to both test results and observed behavior.